So, here’s the story. The BRAVO! committee and
my current lab, Neural Systems Memory and Aging, thought
it would be a good idea to send me to the Netherlands
to do research. But, they didn’t want to send
me to just any old city or any old lab; they wanted
me to go to Amsterdam to work in the blossoming behavioral
neuroscience lab of Dr. Cyriel
Pennartz. Now, before
I tell you about how amazing the city is, I should
tell you about what I spent most of my time doing there:
working!
The behavioral neuroscience lab, located at University
of Amsterdam, focuses on the higher cognitive functions
of the brain such as learning, memory and attention.
For the project that I worked on we were primarily
concerned with the learning and remembering of contextual
and discrete cue information.
A good deal of research has gone into asking questions
about learning and memory because they are not only
philosophically interesting but they can have a huge
impact on treatments for degenerative diseases like
Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s. This wealth
of research data has pointed to a couple of brain structures,
which seem to play an important role in memory and
learning: the hippocampus and the amygdala. Now, there
are a bunch of theories, which attempt to explain the
roles of these structures in the above-mentioned cognitive
functions, but there is one hypothesis that seems to
be very popular. Dr. Pennartz and colleagues like to
call this theory the “Modal hypothesis” because
it claims that each structure deals with only a certain
type of information. Explicitly, the hypothesis states
that the hippocampus is responsible for learning contextual
cue information and that the amygdala is responsible
for learning discrete cue information. What this means
is that the hippocampus learns that being in a certain
environment means a reward will be received and the
amygdala learns that a certain discrete cue, like a
small light turning on, means the animal will get a
reward. There has been plenty of evidence to support
this hypothesis but a small amount of counter evidence
has also been reported. This counter evidence makes
the Modal hypothesis seem a bit tenuous. So, what we
want to answer is what are the hippocampus and amygdala
actually doing?
But wait, it gets better!
It turns out that these two structures have neural
connections into a structure called the nucleus accumbens
(NAc). The NAc is a part of the basil ganglia and is
known for being a type of reward center in the brain.
Recent studies have shown that the NAc may be important
in learning as well. Another interesting thing about
the NAc is that it has neural connections to motor
areas of the brain. Because of the input connections
from the hippocampus and the amygdala and the output
connection to the motor areas, studying the NAc could
lead to a better understanding of how learned information
is used to execute behavior.
To investigate these questions, we used an apparatus
known as the Y-maze. This maze is particularly interesting
because it contains three identical rooms meaning that
discrete cue and contextual cues were the same in each
room. The animal, a rat in this case, will only get
a reward in one of the three rooms so it must rely
on external cues given by us, of course, to find where
that room will be. What we found was that three out
of four rats learned contextual cues and discrete cues,
so they knew exactly where the rewarded room was and
that a small light coming on in that room would distribute
a reward, but it was unclear whether they were using
the external cues to find the rewarded room or if they
were learning from simply receiving the reward in the
one room. It was concluded from our analysis that the
only way to be certain of the rat’s behavior
was to change the task the animal was asked to perform.
Although it might seem disappointing to work on a project
for three months and then have to change the procedure,
it was actually very beneficial. We were able to identify
what could and could not be done to understand the
questions we were asking, and we learned a lot about
what sort of statistics we must do in order to determine
if the animals were truly learning. It also reminded
me how difficult it is to do biological research. The
amount of knowledge and creativity needed to tease
apart such complicated processes in living subjects
is incredible, and it is no wonder that this sort of
research happens very slowly.
The city of Amsterdam, however, is anything but slow!
But, before I launch into tour guide mode, I would
like to tell you a little bit about the Dutch culture
because it made a strong impression on me. First of
all, these are people who value honesty and personal
freedom to the extent that it does not harm others.
But don’t be confused; relaxed policies on prostitution
and marijuana are merely the tip of the iceberg with
regard to personal freedom and choice. One of the main
things that the people I worked with in the lab taught
me was that the Dutch society is not a competitive
one (unless we’re talking about soccer!). What
they meant was that there wasn’t a lot of pressure
to get the best grade or make the most money or have
the most respectable job. What was important, and they
stressed this, was personal happiness, personal choice
and the enjoyment of life, and how you attained this
was for you to decide. It was an amazing experience
for me to be in a culture that was only concerned with
my being happy in what I was doing. And as long as
I’m doing neuroscience, I’m happy!
OK, now for the best of Amsterdam: the art, the museums
and the clubs. Amsterdam has art from Rembrandt to
Van Gogh and even some of the most amazing modern art
shows I have ever seen. In case you plan on visiting
I strongly recommend not only the Van Gogh museum but
also a small modern photography gallery called Foam.
You won’t be disappointed. Also, keep your eyes
out for small galleries located all around the city;
these local artists know what they are doing. You shouldn’t
miss the Anne Frank House either because it adds a
tangible dimension to what you learned in high school
history class. Speaking of history class, the Rijks
museum also recounts the amazing and tragic story of
the Dutch East India Company and it really shouldn’t
be missed.
Finally, the clubs in Amsterdam are awesome. If you
wanted to see a famous DJ in the States and s/he wasn’t
playing anywhere, it was because they were in Amsterdam
playing one of the five million raves that they hold
in their athletic stadiums. These things are huge!
I had the opportunity to see some DJs play at the MelkWeg
(Milkyway) and I was not let down. In addition, if
you like jazz, the North Sea Jazz Festival is held
annually in the Netherlands. Rumor has it that Miles
Davis never missed a performance there.
All in all, I had a phenomenal time. I was reminded
of the difficulties of science, I learned about an
amazing culture, and I made some true friends. If anyone
is considering applying to BRAVO! I whole-heartedly
encourage you to do so; my experience in the beautiful
country of the Netherlands was priceless.
Amanda Casale, UBRPer in Dr. Bruce McNaughton’s
lab, Neural Systems, Memory & Aging